April 2018

I love my Panasonic Lumix GX85, it is not too small like the GM1 and not too big like the GX8.

The GX85 is perfectly balance and comfortable to hold with most of the compact M43 lenses, it gets a bit front heavy when you start using heavy or long lenses on this "thin" body.

Unlike the GX7 it replaced (the GX85 is GX7 Mk2 in Japan), the "front grip" on the GX85 is not thick enough to stabilise a long or heavy lens, this is when I decided to get an external grip.

After much searches, I am shocked that there are less than a handful grips for the GX85, most of them are NOT grips per sec but thumb rests EXCEPT ONE!



J.B. Camera Designs is owned and operated by a passionate photographer and photo equipment enthusiast J.B.Moore in Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA. They produce a range of hand crafted GRIPS for different cameras.

The one for my GX85 is the  J.B. Pro Wood Grip.

Eight days after I placed my order at their web site, my grip arrived!



The base of the grip is made of strong Peruvian Walnut and the vertical post is custom machined out of solid aluminium and then anodised to give a unique texture & professional look.

JB reckoned wood is a great material for camera grips because of its natural properties: great strength while being lightweight and the natural grain texture it provides for grip.

I actually find the walnut base beautifully unique and over time, they say the oils from your skin and any dings will only add to the awesome look of the Wood Grip.


We will see ;)



The JB grip is designed for full access to the battery and memory card compartment while attached. Tripod threads are also fully available through their custom Tripod Attachment Screw. They even include a US coin to attach the grip to your camera!


A "cut out" on the grip allow you to flip out the LCD screen easily.


The grip adds 77 gram to the camera, a tiny weight really.


The gripped GX85 with the rather heavy Nikon 105/2.8 FF, MF lens.


Much more steady and comfortable with the grip!!

Famous Last Words...

Is the JB Grip worth the US$80 (not including postage) cost?

It is!

With the grip the GX85 feels so much better in my hand.

So much easier to hold when I mount my heavy MF Nikon lenses on it.  I also like that the wide base plate lets me set my camera down and it doesn't tip over!

Every Pro Wood Grip is guaranteed for life.

"Apa Lagi You Mahu?" (What Else Do You Want)

NO, I DO NOT WORK FOR JB CAMERA DESIGNS.  :)

DECISION, decision, decision!!

After I post my LUMIX GX9 a Better GX85, I got this comment...


Augusto said...
Your post is exactly what I was looking for since I still can't decide which one of these two cameras I should buy. I'm really inclined to get the GX85 due to the little difference in quality and considering that it's half the price of the GX9. But looking at these 2 pictures you took, I noticed that the road pavement in the one you took with the GX85 seems to be cracked while in the other picture it's perfect. Is it normal in the GX85?

I have to go back to my picture archive and look at those pictures again!




These are the pictures in question, the top one was taken with my GX85 and the bottom, a review GX9 from Panasonic New Zealand.

Both were using the 12-32 kit lens, both were shot at 12mm f/6.3.

Both shots were from RAW format.

To satisfy Augusto's curiosity, I crop into both picture at 100% to pixel peep, here are the results.

From GX85, crop to 100%

From GX9, crop to 100%.

Can you notice the sharpness differences?

I can't!

Just to be sure, lets go 200%, shall we?

From GX85, 200% crop.

From GX9, 200% crop.
Famous Last Words...

From what we can see, I concluded that we are unable to differentiates files from GX85 and GX9.

Taking into account that the GX85 is nearly 50% cheaper, I would keep mine for a few more years.

Did that answer your question Augusto? 

Before I start my rant, please look at my work flow...

I do casual reviewing for Panasonic New Zealand, I shoot all my test pix in BOTH RAW and JPEG. Since every new camera have a unique RAW file, I usually was able to update my FREE Adobe DNG Converter before I receive the new camera.

After I got all the test shots I wanted, I convert all the Panasonic RW2 files to DNG for easy opening with Adobe Camera Raw in my OLD Photoshop CS5. I also open my JPEG files the same way.

I thrashed all the RW2 after they were converted to DNG.

So far so good, as expected the same JPEG and RAW files LOOK identical.

Right?


That is what I thought, take a look at some of the files taken with different Panasonic Lumix cameras in RAW and JPEG.





Everything look HUNKY DORY till three weeks ago, when I finished reviewing Panasonic's latest LUMIX GX9.

There was a strange phenomenon I cannot explain, I wrote about it in  LUMIX GX9 RAW & JPEG INTEGRITY.

The phenomenon was discovered by accident because I was forced to open the GX9 RW2 file with my AFFINITY PHOTO, I cannot convert it to DNG like I always do because Adobe has not come out with the update at that time.



Can you notice the differences?  Take a closer look again...


I was stunned that the JPEG version of the same file was CROPPED by this much from the RW2 file!

I seek an answer from Panasonic New Zealand and received this reply...

"Have you tried testing the Raw files in Adobe also now it is supported?

The factory have come back saying the difference is because Affinity currently don’t receive our Raw file information so the effects are from their interpretation of the raw file."

So it was Panasonic who put in the instruction for the file to be crop when it is open! And since Adobe has updated their latest DNG Converter, I did another test.


As expected, the JPEG and the DNG files look exactly the same. Adobe DNG Converter carry out the instruction from Panasonic to crop off the 4 sides of the file. As for Affinity Photo, it just open the RW2 file as it was, ignoring the crop instruction!

And since I happen to have the RW2 from my GX85, I did the same test and discovered the "CROP EFFECT" also apply to the GX85 RAW files!


Famous Last Words...

The "CROP EFFECT" is significant to me because...

It took away the four corner of coverage from the lens in use, for instance, if the RW2 image was what the 12mm saw, the JPEG and DNG cropped image CANNOT be what a 12mm lens saw!

This test (for me) opened a Pandora box, from now on I will have to keep my RW2 files in case I need the FULL file coverage without the corner being cropped!

To put it succinctly, I expect my lenses to provide WHAT I SEE is WHAT I GET and NOT LESS COVERAGE.

Have you ever thought about that?

Differ-Me

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget